The Golden Age of Movies?

THREE MOVIE ERAS

Here are three movie trailers from three different periods of movie making. It seems obvious which period carried the highest production values; i.e., the best aural and visual experience, which, when seen in theaters, on film, is a huge part of what the art of film is about.

"Mutiny on the Bounty" 1935. (Early Hollywood.)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtmV2tpbnjA&feature=related

"Mutiny on the Bounty" 1962. (Wide screen/original Technicolor era.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEmZ_A0UTrA

"The Bounty" 1984. (Post inflation/revisionist era.)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5QER2wu0lg&feature=related

Other aspects of the three films-- screenplay, casting, acting, editing-- are up for debate.

Planning the Project

FYI: I still believe I can pull the El Cid Project off-- which means staging a showing of the film, as film, in New York City, hopefully close to Ground Zero. There are, of course, details and preparations to work out.

In the meantime I'm working on a post devoted to the Miseducation of America-- about how we've been raising a generation of so-called "best and brightest" who don't even believe in their own country, and whose thinking on most topics is generally all screwed up. Stay tuned.

Another Classic

Here’s the main title to another great film made in 1961, “The Guns of Navarone.”

www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvM4q0Vbsy0&feature=related

A story about latter-day heroes. It has many of the same strengths as “El Cid”: wonderful cinematography, magnificent score, strong acting, classic pacing where everything is set up step-by-step to bring the moviegoer emotionally into the film experience. The structure is intentionally mythic—the Guns are like ancient monsters—to match the mythic setting. Seen on a giant screen, this is a tremendous experience.

We can only revive the culture if we’re able to recognize our cultural high points. Fifty years of cultural garbage have destroyed many values, but perhaps not all of them.

(Note: The narration by James Robertson Justice is missing from this video, unfortunately; a speech about "gods and demi-gods" which is important to setting the story and mood.)

Ben Yagoda: Out of Touch

OR, FIGHTING PAST WARS

Here’s a curious column appearing this day in the Philadelphia Inquirer, a bankrupt newspaper:

http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20101102_The_last_days_of_obscenity.html

Writer Ben Yagoda is fighting battles of fifty years ago. I guess it makes the battles fairly winnable. But where are newspaper columns from Ben Yagoda about the disappearance of Molly Norris?

The threat to free speech in America today doesn’t involve obscenity. Indeed, in this rather obscene society, one finds all the obscenity one can want. Four letter words have become regular discourse. The threat to free expression now comes from the advocates of political correctness, a viewpoint which demands that all speech be squelched which can possibly offend the sensibilities of specially-designated groups. In Molly Norris’s case, the religion of Islam, which meanwhile is busily squelching all contrary beliefs wherever it can. (57 Christians including two priests slaughtered in Baghdad Sunday. We fought a bloody war for that?)

We’re living in a world where down is up and up is down. Characters like Ben Yagoda are part of the problem. Look how bravely he defends D.H. Lawrence! 50 or 80 years after the fact when no risk is involved. About Molly Norris, from this defender of liberal principles, nary a word. 

Expanding the Ranks

THE FIGHT FOR WESTERN VALUES

One thing the Right has to watch out for is not thinking the fight for Western values belongs only to them. Rights like free speech, after all, once were known as liberal values before liberalism transmogrified into something not liberal.

Yes, there will be johnny-come-latelies as more Molly Norrises lose their naivete. They need to be welcomed and defended. The fight belongs to all. What's striking about the movie :"El Cid" is that the character of Rodrigo prevails by welcoming all to the battle against the fanatical enemy Ben Yussef. The idea is to isolate and marginalize your opponent-- not yourself.

Molly Norris's fight is everyone's fight. Everyone who believes in the values our nation was birthed with 234 years ago.

The Unholy Alliance

THE DEATH OF LIBERALISM III

Here's a post on a site which turns reality on its head, so that those issuing the fatwah against Molly Norris are the victims, as well as, somehow, in some Orwellian universe, defenders of free speech:

http://www.dailymailtimes.com/?p=146

Molly Norris may have been extremely naive. She may well even have thought to gain a spot of publicity. But NO WAY does she deserve having to lose her identity; to no longer exist. What country is this?? If Americans don't have the freedom-- and the safety-- to be naive, then we've truly lost this country. The concept "America" no longer exists.

Click on the "About" at the Daily Mail Times site and you'll see it's the project of a bizarre combination of radical Leftists and Islamists. What could they possibly have in common? Given their very different ideologies, what's their objective? It's hard not to think that being anti-American is enough of a commonality for them.

The Death of Liberalism II

Here’s a link to one of the forum discussions I started—referred to below—about the Molly Norris tragedy:

http://wemakezines.ning.com/forum/topics/the-disappearance-of-molly

Note that there’s more commitment to childish notions of multiculturalism among today’s writers and artists than to free speech. The We Make Zines site has almost three thousand readers, yet not a one of them was able to step forward and stand up for Molly Norris’s freedoms.

What’s known as “Liberal America” now isn’t liberal and is scarcely American.